Motocross Media and the Two Stroke
Over the past few months many interviews with the Super Stars of Motocross seem to contain a question about two-strokes. Of course asking them what their thoughts are about them. Kind of a loaded question.
As an example, here is one that was posted on Vital MX by MXEditor – Sean Goulart where he interviewed James Stewart at the Fuel TV Studios in NYC.
MXN: Do you ever still ride a two-stroke, just for fun?
JAMES STEWART: I rode the ones at my ride day, the two-strokes, and it’s just not…it’s just not there anymore you know? The new 450′s, like especially the Yamaha, are so good it’s hard to really want to ride a two-stroke for fun, the only thing that’s cool is the sound. I had one I rode at the ride days but I almost got smoked by a few dudes when I was riding a 250 two-stroke, so I said nah just gotta give it up, I just have to.
Of course this started a flurry of posts from all sides of the debate. If you would like to see for yourself check out this link – http://www.vitalmx.com/forums/MotoRelated,20/Interview-with-James-Stewart-talks-about-2strokes-family-and-Bubbas-World,900676
Now let’s take a step back and think about something here. Are we asking the wrong people the wrong question?
How about a couple of hypotheticals. Do you think a cattle rancher would suggest you become a vegetarian? How about your typical MD, do you think he’ll send you over to an alternative medical practitioner? Would a died-in-the-wool Oil man recommend that you use alternative energy?
The answer to all these questions is easy, they wouldn’t. Even if in their heart of hearts they believe in those alternative solutions.
Which begs the question, why? It’s really pretty simple actually, they have a vested interest in their current paradigm. Are they wrong to not recommend what they may believe in? Well no, that’s how they make their living. Why would they suggest you do something that would affect their livelihood?
Now lets get back to our MX Superstar, here’s a guy that gets paid a considerable amount of money to race a machine that his employer pays him to race. It would be IMPOSSIBLE for them to say publicly that they prefer something other than what they are paid to endorse. That would be professional suicide.
Personally, I would never expect these guys to state an endorsement for the two-stroke.
Let’s look at the reasons behind journalists asking this question.
They are reading the same forums, sites, magazines as all of us. The word on the “street” is two-strokes for motocross. The dealer showroom floors are crowded with leftover four-stroke machines. There are a bunch in the warehouses as well. The manufacturers four-stroke wonder bikes are currently selling for a fraction of the Suggested List Price.
On the other hand, try to locate a brand new two-stroke at a dealer. You have to start searching dealers far and wide in order to even locate one in stock! Not only that, but the dealer realizes he has a “hot” commodity and can actually make a profit by selling a motocross bike (something that doesn’t happen very often) so the price is firm and usually very close to retail. All this even though in some cases, the two-stroke is a “dated” machine with very few technological updates.
So these well meaning journalists think that the best person to ask about two-strokes is the MX Superstars, the guys who are paid to sell four-strokes to the public. Does anyone else see the folly in this thinking? Sure the journalist is happy because it sparks the debate again and if there is anything that MX fans are passionate about it’s the two-stroke vs. four-stroke debate. Many more people read their stuff and the magazine, website or media outlet is happy because more readers see their ads.
The funny thing is that at least in the case of the Stewart interview, the journalist “defended” James by saying that he was very sincere when he said it, so it must be true. My illusion is that even if James loves the two-stroke and would love to be able to race it, he would be very sincere about telling a journalist that he prefers the four-stroke.
And I don’t blame him. He is being paid to sell the bikes that Yamaha wants to promote and sell. Come on!
Do you really think it’s that hard to be sincere, if you are being paid say $500,000. per year (purposely stated low) to ride a motorcycle? It’d be easy. Anyone could do it. Those that say they couldn’t or wouldn’t have not been in that position. It’s easy to say you’d do the right thing when it’s not your career on the line.
Which now brings us full circle, why is this question asked of someone when the answer will be no?
There is one reason… the tide is truly changing. More and more of the family-oriented, rank and file motocross racers are choosing what works best for them. And many of them are choosing the two-stroke.
This is big business and there are tremendous profits to be made or lost here. The manufacturers are hurting, the dealers are hurting and there’s a lot of product that racers just aren’t interested in buying. The marketing hype has run it’s course and has now slammed directly into reality.
Is it possible that the manufacturers “suggest” that the journalists bring up the two-stroke question? We’ll never know, but it’s possible.
And for those on the four-stroke side of the fence, I’m not spouting conspiracy theories here, just asking questions and pointing out the blatantly obvious.
The question needs to move away from the Super Stars and come back to the person you see when you look in a mirror. What’s best for you?
You know, if that answer is a four-stroke, hey that’s great. I wish you the very best. For some people that is the best machine for them. This is not about killing the four-stroke or taking them away from the people that believe in them.
It’s purely about choice. Two Stroke racers want a choice. They want to choose what’s best for them.
Unfortunately, that choice has been taken away, first by lopsided rules. Then because of flagging sales figures, some manufacturers stopped importing two-strokes. Now with the tide shifting, there is a shortage of new two-strokes.
The moral of the story? Much of the motocross media has a vested interest in the business. Don’t buy into the marketing hype, make up your own mind based on your experience and what you think is best for you.
Keep the rubber side down.











Facebook
Twitter
Youtube
Comments
By Bill Truax on April 24th, 2010 at 6:39 pm
To ask James this question isnt very fair. First he was riding a stock 250 and his 450 is built to the hilt! A close friend of mine has a child who has been picked up by a major motorcycle manufactor. He said they got a couple of bikes and one was their race bike built to the hilt custom ground cams custom exhaust and suspension. The stock bike is a dog and the factory bike is unlike any bike they have riden. They change the engine out every couple of races and the suspension! Again the engine cost is in the 10′s of thousands of dollars. They would not race a stock version of this bike but they were successfully competing on a reletively stock two stroke.
By 2STROKEREVOLUTION on April 24th, 2010 at 9:17 pm
No really James?! A stock 250 is slower than a Factory, $50,000 450F? I would have never guessed! How much did Yamaha pay you to say 2-strokes are dead and the YZ450F is amazing? And I am sure that $500,000 is low like you said. I heard Carmichael got paid near $10 million by Suzuki so I expect Stewart to be similar.
By Family Man on April 25th, 2010 at 1:31 am
Stewart goes on to contradict himself. If he doesnt like ride a twostroke why did he respond this way… smells fishy.
MXN: You gave one of your old bikes to your brother haven’t
you? The KX250?
JAMES STEWART: No actually. No that’s actually his bike, and a lot of
people think that but if you know anything about factory equipment,
you don’t get to keep it, you gotta send it back. So if you think my
brother has my two-stroke 250 engine, that’s not even true, you gotta
give all that stuff back, I wish…I would have kept it for myself.
By JohnNicholas on April 25th, 2010 at 8:36 am
Family Man – You are so right! Did you notice that James showed all of his Championship winning machines on the MTV Crips show? If he had to give the bikes back, why did he have so many of his championship winning machines?
The other aspect to consider is how many machines do you think the factory builds for a racer like him in a year? It certainly isn’t 1 machine for the whole season!
Just a week or so ago someone posted photos of a factory Kawasaki SR250 two-stroke with Ryan Villipoto’s graphics on it, in front of the Factory Kawasaki rig. How did Ryan get that machine and who gave it to him?
Pics located here – http://twostrokemotocross.com/forum/index.php/topic,519.0.html
From the rumors I heard, James gets paid about 12 million dollars a year. Not sure how much comes from Yamaha….
Besides, if he didn’t like the two-stroke, why would he bother to use one on his ride days? Yamaha has plenty of YZF450′s he even had one sitting there in the pits…
Something smells really bad!! And it’s not the two-stroke.
By 602MX on April 25th, 2010 at 8:52 am
Correct …Stewart is being paid to race and promote the new 450cc Yamaha (an open bike model)….Compare 250cc to 250cc…
Sure James, if they evened up the displacement in the “lites” class and you had to win the 250 class, you would rather ride a 250 four stroke ….yeah right……
The interviewers ask all the wrong questions….silly…..
By iluvmx on April 25th, 2010 at 12:10 pm
Hey everybody, just signed up for this site….awesome site. Here is my take on this……..James Stewart is quoted as saying in another article on this site that(paraphrasing)-”it was the two stroke that he wanted to take across the country with him on his ride days”. I’ve watched many of the vidoes of his ride day videos on the 2t, and with the crowds and exposure that this was generating I guarantee you the Yamaha brass pulled James aside and reminded him that advertising 2t’s (by riding them publicly) was counter productive to the company’s marketing and sales focus, which is to sell 4t’s. Think about it, it hurts 4t sales when the best rider in the world is ripping on a 2t and showing all those youngsters how amazing the 2t is. Yamaha pays him to peddle (sell) 4t’s. Did you see his front wheelie into the corner, drop the back end down, and roost away???!!!! OMG- I’ve never seen a move like that in my life! Stuff like that sells 2t’s which is what the big 4 do not want. Yamaha quashed his 2t ride days because they pay him to sell 4t’s. Thanks for letting me vent- 2 strokes forever!
By motoman465 on April 25th, 2010 at 8:44 pm
Ask any factory-supported racer whether they prefer a two-stroke or a four-stroke and you will get the same answers that James gave here. In this situation, it would be career suicide for James to say he prefers a two-stroke. Not only would it have serious repercussions with his current employer, but every other factory is listening. Just another example of don’t bite the hand that feeds you!!!
By Punisher on April 26th, 2010 at 10:41 am
Well, i remember that James Stewart had to make a video where other yamaha riders asked him about the new yamaha 450f because many rumors about this bike.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fh7IxOJsR-Y
Well, i think that many people know now that four strokes are bikes very expensive for fun only and Stewart, again, have to answer.
By wintrader on April 26th, 2010 at 12:28 pm
A stock 250 is slower than a Factory, $50,000 450F? I would have never guessed! (this is not true)But even though the 2 stroke is cheaper then the 450 does not mean he will be faster on the 4 stroke. Watch the laptimes of Seattle supercross. Same laptimes of 450 and 250′s so i do not see any reason he would be faster on the 450 then on the 250 2 stroke with same quality suspension. The truth is that laptimes of 250 2 or for stroke are most of the time faster the the 450!!! So this is a FACT!!! So when james states he is faster on the 450 then on the 250 2 stroke he is not telling the truth. Watch the laptimes and you will see! 450 are NOT faster round a track then 250′s 2 or 4 strokes. This 4 stroke thing is completely useless and only benefits the factories. A hype. But a smart hype when they tell their riders that they just cant keep up with their 250 2 strokes against 450 4 strokes.It is a fact that this is not true. Again watch the laptimes and you will know.
Seattle laptimes:
250 FAST QUALIFIERS
1. 12……Jake Weimer……58.418
2. 49……Wil Hahn…..58.646
3. 20……Broc Tickle……58.812
4. 38……Trey Canard……58.952
5. 48……Max Anstie…..59.397
6. 100……Josh Hansen……59.427
7. 410……Eric Mccrummen……1:00.255
8. 116……Ryan Morais…….1:00.360
9. 585……Travis Baker…….1:00.666
10. 885……Jeffrey Mann…….1:00.859
450 FAST QUALIFIERS
1. 75……Josh Hill……58.044
2. 14……Kevin Windham…….58.188
3. 18……Davi Millsaps……58.535
4. 22……Chad Reed……58.568
5. 10……Tommy Hahn……58.742
6. 5……Ryan Dungey…….59.635
7. 29……Andrew Short……1:00.135
8. 55……Kyle Chisholm…….1:00.165
9. 23……Justin Brayton…….1:00.192
10. 27……Nick Wey …….1:00.357
You can say same laptimes. In last Gp in The Netherlands 250 4 stroke was faster then 450 4 stroke.
Watch forum.
So better buy a 2 stroke you will be faster and maintainance will be cheaper. And they sound better. I think in a few years 4 stroke will be dead. And if not the motox sport will get out of reach of normal people and less and less bikes will be sold so in the end the factories are killing themselves. In the Netherlands second hand 4 strokes are very difficult to sell. Lots of ppl are going back to 2 strokes.
This will accelerate when a top rider will start winning on a 2 stroke. If this happens just 1 times the hype will be over very soon.
By wintrader on April 26th, 2010 at 1:00 pm
If i start sounding boring sorry but last time. KTM put a lot of money in the 350 4 stroke and they put cairoli on the bike to win races. Seems next year the 350 will be the next standard in mx 1 class. Why? Because by now almost everyone found out that the 450”s are not faster round the track then 250′s but actually slower. Because ktm do not want to loose money on their investment in the 350 they do not want cairoli to ride a 2 stroke ktm. They a sell a lot of 2 strokes already. Now they want to sell the new 350 4 stroke. All the amatures next year want the 350 because they think they will be faster.
Heard stefan Everst talking about the 350 and he said the 450 has too much hp and too hard to handle and sometimes the 250 has too little horsepower and so on. Still cairoli was about 2 seconds slower on his 350 then herlings was on his 250 4 stroke. So figure it out for yourself.
All just marketing thing.
So last time almost never a 450 will be faster round a track then a 250. And certainly not on racedistance because all that 450 hp is tiring you out. Sand tracks 450 always slower. Only on tracks will long straight 450 faster.
So actually it is an unfair advantage to ride a 250 in a 450 class. If you do not agree think of the reason why cairoli rides a 350 and not a 450.
The mx 1 class is just an other class an other thing!! Other tiredness other way of riding. Why do you think cairoli rides a 350??? It is true that herlings would had won the mx 1 class on his 250 BUT would he also have won on a 450??? Just other thing! Respect the 450 for what it is also the 500 2 stroke but do not think it is the faster bike on a track because it is a fact it is not the faster bike round a track.
PPPfff is said it again. hahahahahah
By tommy959 on April 26th, 2010 at 9:08 pm
I definitly agree with you on this subject.I had a few people out to my track last week and i had a chance to compare. I rode the 250f first for a few laps and then the 450.The power of the 450 I just couldn’ ride it aggrresively, It was just to much for me. The 250 I could definitely ride harder. But the characteristics of the four stroke motor and weight just doesn’t suit me.I love my 250 YZ !! I get to check out a 2010 KTM 250 2 stroke this week. BRRAAPP !!
By jrhockey03 on April 27th, 2010 at 9:28 pm
I’ve got an ’02 Kx250 that I just rebuilt from the ground up. I rode with a couple of my buddies at the track last weekend. One has a KTM450EXC and the other one has a former pro’s 08 YZ450. The stock KTM with the enduro tank was way easier to ride than either my KX or the YZ, but those damn 4 strokes are so heavy. It felt like I was riding a mountain bike when I switched back to my KX and it certainly isn’t the thinest of the bunch either, plus it sounded way better and its quieter. I know where KTM is coming from with the HP tiring you out, and a 250F doesn’t have enough ponies to carry my 210 pounds around the track. If I could afford it I would probably own both a 2 and a 4 stroke, its kinda fun switching back and forth between the two. But since I can only have one bike, its the 2 stroke all the way!
By miedosoracing on April 28th, 2010 at 12:28 pm
You wanna know what’s really funny about what he said? Local guys on 450F’s were almost beating him. Why so funny? Because he is basically saying he isn’t really that good then. He is saying it’s all his bike. So, let’s do stock rules for the pro’s. Because we all know the top 10 have a much faster bike than the bottom of the barrell 450F pros. According to him then, racing would be more fair. Because if a couple local guys can run with Bubba Stewart. They should be racing for Yamaha. LOL. Second, that part was just funny. But as we all know, the final year on a 2004? Kawi 250 2 stroke he was beating every person except the goat. So to say a couple local guys were running with him only insults himself. Finally, of course the 2 stokes are dated compared to the 4 strokes. How much money have the OEM’s spent on these bikes. If all the R&D would have gone into DI and updates to the 2 strokes. These bikes would spank the 450F. Give me a KTM 250sx with Direct Injection and let’s compare horsies. I’d bet the 250SX with DI would put out a good 5-10 hp more than the 450F’s.
By 2STROKEREVOLUTION on April 28th, 2010 at 1:44 pm
I have both a 2-stroke and a 4-stroke. I love my 4-stroke and my 2-stroke. But they are good for different things. 4-strokes have smooth powerbands. I use my XR250 for long rides, 100+ miles, in the desert. The powerband and power doesn’t wear me out and I can just cruise if I want. It is also good for technical terrain where the engine won’t die, runs as great at the bottom as it does up top, and just keeps chugging along. And because it is air cooled and not shim under bucket valves, maintenance is fairly easy. I can adjust the valves from the head with ease MYSELF unlike new 4-strokes. It will also last me a lifetime since it isn’t tuned to oblivion like the new MX 4-strokes. And it isn’t loud as hell like them.
Now my 2-stroke, KTM 380SX, is just a beast. It has more power on tap than any sane person could need. But that is part of the fun. No matter how fast you are going you can pull a wheelie. But for long rides it gets tiring and sucks gas like no tomorrow. The light weight is great. The powerband isn’t good for technical terrain. But it is the most fun I have ever had on a bike.
I got a chance to ride a KTM 300XC-W. That bike combines most of the good of both bikes. Smooth power band with a lot of power on tap, light weight, good for hauling ass and great for technical terrain. The only thing that makes me keep my XR250 is the gas mileage and I don’t have to mix gas. The 300XC-W sucks gas too. My friend with that bike has a 3.5 gallon tank and carries a 2 Liter bottle of gas and still can’t go as far as my 2.5 gallon tank. I also like to ride into town and fill up my tank.
The only thing that can do it all will be DI 2-strokes.
By 2STROKEREVOLUTION on April 28th, 2010 at 1:48 pm
miedosoracing
DI does little for top end power. If a bike with a carb is tuned for peak then DI will not gain you any there. It will bring up the power everywhere else in the curve though. DI should be able to add a slight increase in HP because you can run higher compression. So power should be around Maico 250 with a lot more low end. So like you said, maybe 5hp more than a 450 with more low end power and torque.
By miedosoracing on April 28th, 2010 at 2:20 pm
Well, I think the carbed bikes could actually be higher peak power if tuned like that. The reason I say this, is look at the size of carbs they use on them. My 125 which is made for topend only, uses a 38mm carb. my 250 and 500 use the 38mm as well. If we went by peak power, my guess, is that a 250 should be around a 40-42mm and a 500 42-44mm. Just my opinion
But I’m sure you are correct, so maybe not so much on topend, but surely much better than what we see right now.
By 2STROKEREVOLUTION on April 29th, 2010 at 3:48 pm
A larger carb shouldn’t help either. The current carbs can deliver enough fuel. If tuned for peak power they deliver the perfect gas/air ratio. But carbs fall short since they do this at one rpm so all the lower rpm lose power. Now if it is tuned for low rpm power it will run great down there but the peak horsepower will drop. Direct Injection can do it all. It provides the right fuel/air mixture at every rpm.
By OKmotocross.com on May 1st, 2010 at 3:14 pm
Here is a helmet cam video of Stewart riding in texas on his 2t. In the video at roughly 2:00 in he is asked if he likes playing around on a 2t and he replies yes. The audio is kinda hard to hear, but it is interesting.
http://www.vimeo.com/6976029
By yz125rider157 on May 7th, 2010 at 8:05 pm
James stewart is one of my all around favorite riders. Its definitely a little bit fishy how he would say those things about twostrokes. Watching his old videos on his 125 and 250 i think he is the best to ever ride a two stroke. Hes so fast smooth and never lets off the throttle. I just want to know how much yamaha paid him to say the four strokes are better.
By yz125rider157 on May 16th, 2010 at 10:12 am
I saw a very interesting video today on racerxonline.com that every body needs to check out. Max Anstie is testing a yz144 kit that GYTR made for 2005 up to 2010 yz125s. Max Anstie said some very cool stuff that us two stroke fans like to hear. CHECK it out at racerxonline.com the video is called GYTR yamaha yz144. It would also be a great video to put up on the site.
By bigdan789 on May 26th, 2010 at 3:32 am
goin back to what you were saying about dealers being firm on their 2-stroke prices and tryin to sell 4-strokes cheap…for example in late 2007 i went to a local kawasaki dealer and was looking for a kx250. on my way in the door i spotted one, and only one….had to have it. well i walked up and the tag said $5,999…so then the owner of the dealership who was there walks up to me and asked if i was interested, i say yes and then he trys turning me over to a 2008 kx450f. he says “Ill sell it to you for $4,999″. i said to him that srry but i dont wanna shim valves every 2 months, buy oil filters and oil every time i change the oil, and pay $800 just to upgrade the exhaust. ill take that kx250. I still own it and sill love it, never will i sell it.
By joeshepherd on June 2nd, 2010 at 11:54 am
I have always loved the sport and tried my whole life to get into the sport. My family didn’t have money and I currently don’t have much either. I looked at all bikes and have enough knowledge to find out whats best for me. This comes from a childhood of on and off spurts of riding and letdowns. I always told myself ” If I just had the money to afford a bike and ride more often I could be good”. With most poor trailer park kids like me that wasn’t possible. This is a belief I had from the first time on a track ( on a borrowed bike ) I could clear all the obstacles with a small amount of practice. I just didn’t have the stamina that comes with countless hours at the track and ” O Yea ” a bike. In those days most if not all bikes at the track were two strokes. I have kept up with the sport watching all AMA events in my area, and all local races. I am well aware of the four stroke and its rise to dominence. I just didnt know why. I knew it was a time I could buy a bike I just didn’t know which would be better for me a two stroke or four. I was ready to finally do what I loved so I started looking on the Internet on the subject of two or four. I found nothing but people in blogs begging for the two stroke to come back, and found nothing that made me lean one way or the other. I just couldn’t understand why people just went out and bought four strokes so I tried to find out. I went to the local trck were I would hopefully be riding soon and asked around before I made my purchase. The one comment that kept poppin out was that not alot of pro events allow two stroke 250′s to compete with four stroke 250′s, but im not a pro and this track allows it. One guy I talked to was a young man around 19-20 years old sitting in riding pants and watching his friends ride. I asked him ” Do you ride ”. He said yes, but his bike is broke and needs a head job. He said he doesn’t have the money to fix it and doesn’t when he will be able to afford to fix it. He rides a 450 four stroke and the head job will cost him around 1000 dollars. Since I am a guy with little money and dont want a lot of downtime off a bike this fact intrested me the most. I wondered what i would do in the same situation. I snapped of a comment like, ” Well if you had a 250 two stroke you could probably do the head job yourself and it would probably cost alot less”. He told me he had a 02 yz250 two stroke before he bought his 08yzf450. He told me his two stroke handled as good and felt like it had the same power. He also said yes he could do the head job himself for around 200 dollars and would be on the track right now and wouldn’t be borrowing friends bikes. I noticed his brother who just started in the sport was on a kx125 two stroke. So with this knowledge I left the track after getting a few riding tips here and there and knew I had a decision to make. The only reason I came up with on why everybody is on a four stroke not a two is the AMA supercross and motercross series. I believe people think that if it is good for the AMA its good for me. Those teams have lots of money and technology. I don’t see that much with local riders, and its not my situation either. I need fast and cheap and reliable not fast unreliable and expensive. I wondered if the supercross lites class all rode 250 two strokes what the local track would of looked like then. I believe the fastest rider on the tack is still the fastest if he is on a two stroke or four. I don’t believe the displacement would make a difference until you are in a pro level of racing. I believe speed comes from alot of riding and proper technigue. I decided to buy an 01 yz250 two stroke for 1200 dollars. I found the bike completly stock even the piston was original. It was in the same condition as it was bought of the showeroom floor, with just some minor scratches. I have ben riding and practicing as much as I can and love having my own bike. I hope I made the right decision. If I sat a two stroke lover and a four strok lover side by side what would ther arguments be, and what are the first things I should upgrade on my bike.
Joe Shepherd, Houston tx
By JohnNicholas on June 2nd, 2010 at 1:02 pm
Hello Joe,
Welcome to the site! Congratulations on your new bike!
I wish you every happiness as you get to ride and race it.
As to what you need to upgrade your bike, that is a loaded question. My suggestion to you is to do the maintenance on your machine. Buy some extra air filters (I use and recommend Twin Air) and change them often.
For anyone that does not have a great deal of money I would recommend the same thing. Keep your bike properly maintained, clean and serviced. Wait until the bike is holding you back before making any modifications.
Start with suspension tuning before doing any motor hop up work. Learn how the adjusters work and how they affect the bikes performance and handling under different conditions.
Most importantly.. remember to have fun!
By joeshepherd on June 2nd, 2010 at 3:55 pm
Well its just looks like he will lie for money. He used to be my favorite rider, but not anymore.
Trackbacks