<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too Much Noise &#8211; Are 4 Strokes Killing Motocross?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twostrokemotocross.com/2009/01/too-much-noise-are-4-strokes-killing-motocross/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twostrokemotocross.com/2009/01/too-much-noise-are-4-strokes-killing-motocross/</link>
	<description>The source for two stroke News, Tech and Tips.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:13:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://twostrokemotocross.com/2009/01/too-much-noise-are-4-strokes-killing-motocross/comment-page-1/#comment-2789</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twostrokemotocross.com/?p=780#comment-2789</guid>
		<description>The modern 4 stroke engine is by design quieter and more efficient than a comparable 2 stroke.   People who change their exhaust pipes in order to tweak performance may cause extra, unnecessary noise but it is not the 4 stroke engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The modern 4 stroke engine is by design quieter and more efficient than a comparable 2 stroke.   People who change their exhaust pipes in order to tweak performance may cause extra, unnecessary noise but it is not the 4 stroke engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 50c.c 4t?? - P?gina 2 - psicofxp.com</title>
		<link>http://twostrokemotocross.com/2009/01/too-much-noise-are-4-strokes-killing-motocross/comment-page-1/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>50c.c 4t?? - P?gina 2 - psicofxp.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twostrokemotocross.com/?p=780#comment-419</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cr500af</title>
		<link>http://twostrokemotocross.com/2009/01/too-much-noise-are-4-strokes-killing-motocross/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>cr500af</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twostrokemotocross.com/?p=780#comment-223</guid>
		<description>This issue will always be with us and is only going to get worse. I&#039;m so sick of idiots with loud machines. As long as these companies sell loud bikes and produce these exhaust systems idiots will buy them. I would like to see every bike sold have to come in at 92 decibals and under. The same goes for the exhaust companies. Until drastic measures like this are taken by the companies this issue and debate will forever be present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This issue will always be with us and is only going to get worse. I&#8217;m so sick of idiots with loud machines. As long as these companies sell loud bikes and produce these exhaust systems idiots will buy them. I would like to see every bike sold have to come in at 92 decibals and under. The same goes for the exhaust companies. Until drastic measures like this are taken by the companies this issue and debate will forever be present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bleake637</title>
		<link>http://twostrokemotocross.com/2009/01/too-much-noise-are-4-strokes-killing-motocross/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>bleake637</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twostrokemotocross.com/?p=780#comment-194</guid>
		<description>It is true that we have always battled noise issues, but the modern four-stroke has severely worsened the problem. I recently raced a flat track event on my old bike, (a CRF450) where this was demonstrated to me like never before. I was on the line next to a mess of other 450s and a lone CRF 150. Everyone is idling on the line and I can&#039;t even hear my very loud 450 because the 150 next to me had apparently decided that taking all of the packing out of his muffler was the only way to be cool. I love motorcycles and racing and even think some oudness is part of our sport, but I couldn&#039;t even hear myself think. It was ridiculous. I had been wanting to get back to my roots anyway, but the next week I sold my 450 and went back to the two stroke. I got a brand new YZ250. I don&#039;t know how I ever lived without premix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true that we have always battled noise issues, but the modern four-stroke has severely worsened the problem. I recently raced a flat track event on my old bike, (a CRF450) where this was demonstrated to me like never before. I was on the line next to a mess of other 450s and a lone CRF 150. Everyone is idling on the line and I can&#8217;t even hear my very loud 450 because the 150 next to me had apparently decided that taking all of the packing out of his muffler was the only way to be cool. I love motorcycles and racing and even think some oudness is part of our sport, but I couldn&#8217;t even hear myself think. It was ridiculous. I had been wanting to get back to my roots anyway, but the next week I sold my 450 and went back to the two stroke. I got a brand new YZ250. I don&#8217;t know how I ever lived without premix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eprovenzano</title>
		<link>http://twostrokemotocross.com/2009/01/too-much-noise-are-4-strokes-killing-motocross/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>eprovenzano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twostrokemotocross.com/?p=780#comment-174</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m lucky to have a riding area behind my property.  I was talking to one of my neighbors not long ago.  We were discussing a recent injury I had while riding.  He had no idea I rode, but he asked if I was the one making all the noise back in the woods.  He stated he hardly uses his back yard because of the noise.  I asked him if he was outside earlier in the day...  He was outside as he was cleaning up his deck and doing some yard work.  I informed him, that I was just behind his house all day, riding my bike...   He was astonished, he didn&#039;t know anyone was there... (I always make sure my muffler packing is fresh to do my part to keep the noise down.)   explained to him the sound differences between a 2 stroke and a 4 stroke.  So I also explained to not kill the messenger, that not all riders are riding loud equipment. but unfortunately with 2 stroke tech not being pushed, 4 strokes have taken over.  

This unfortunately is one simple example of what the noise from the thumpers are doing to our riding areas.  I currently can ride out my backyard and enjoy my bike, but its being threatened by the noise pollution of the thumpers, (both bikes and quads.)

We all need to do our part in cutting noise pollution.  Please make sure your equipment is in proper running order.  Consider getting an exhaust which reduces the noise level, instead of increasing it.  We 2 strokers also need to do out part to keep our riding areas open.  Keep the noise level down, and please pick up your trash.

OK, I&#039;ll get off my soap box now....

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m lucky to have a riding area behind my property.  I was talking to one of my neighbors not long ago.  We were discussing a recent injury I had while riding.  He had no idea I rode, but he asked if I was the one making all the noise back in the woods.  He stated he hardly uses his back yard because of the noise.  I asked him if he was outside earlier in the day&#8230;  He was outside as he was cleaning up his deck and doing some yard work.  I informed him, that I was just behind his house all day, riding my bike&#8230;   He was astonished, he didn&#8217;t know anyone was there&#8230; (I always make sure my muffler packing is fresh to do my part to keep the noise down.)   explained to him the sound differences between a 2 stroke and a 4 stroke.  So I also explained to not kill the messenger, that not all riders are riding loud equipment. but unfortunately with 2 stroke tech not being pushed, 4 strokes have taken over.  </p>
<p>This unfortunately is one simple example of what the noise from the thumpers are doing to our riding areas.  I currently can ride out my backyard and enjoy my bike, but its being threatened by the noise pollution of the thumpers, (both bikes and quads.)</p>
<p>We all need to do our part in cutting noise pollution.  Please make sure your equipment is in proper running order.  Consider getting an exhaust which reduces the noise level, instead of increasing it.  We 2 strokers also need to do out part to keep our riding areas open.  Keep the noise level down, and please pick up your trash.</p>
<p>OK, I&#8217;ll get off my soap box now&#8230;.</p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 87cr500rider</title>
		<link>http://twostrokemotocross.com/2009/01/too-much-noise-are-4-strokes-killing-motocross/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>87cr500rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twostrokemotocross.com/?p=780#comment-171</guid>
		<description>The only part that sucks about catching and passing a 4 stroke is the noise belching pig drowns out the sound of my CR500.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only part that sucks about catching and passing a 4 stroke is the noise belching pig drowns out the sound of my CR500.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honda2strokes</title>
		<link>http://twostrokemotocross.com/2009/01/too-much-noise-are-4-strokes-killing-motocross/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Honda2strokes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twostrokemotocross.com/?p=780#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Ride a 2 stroke!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ride a 2 stroke!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The General</title>
		<link>http://twostrokemotocross.com/2009/01/too-much-noise-are-4-strokes-killing-motocross/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>The General</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twostrokemotocross.com/?p=780#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately we seem to be stuck in a Catch 22 position. 

We need quieter bike regulations and the only way to achieve that goal is by influencing the AMA and the FIM that we need them.

These entities believe they are doing a great job at creating and enforcing the regulations they have.

A great deal of racers think that if the rules are set this way, they will comply with them to the limit. The aftermarket companies deliver what their customers are asking for.

The governing bodies are influenced greatly by the manufacturers, so much so that it has been jokingly stated that Honda runs the AMA. I don&#039;t know if I would go that far, but it is worth considering why that joke exists.

The manufacturers claim that it would be difficult and extremely expensive to limit sound levels, so the rules are greatly influenced by this statement of hardship. The AMA and the FIM do not want to put undo pressure on the companies that support their livelihood, so they relax the standards. Or they allow them to be lower than they think would be best.

So now we have the manufacturers and the sanctioning bodies on one side and a few sane voices asking for quieter motocross machines on the other. The problem is that the voices asking for quiet are so few in number. In the middle you have the majority... they may not be giving the subject the attention it deserves because they are not thinking about the future as much as today.

I agree that the question is &quot;how do we influence the powers that be.&quot; I am open to suggestions. Anyone have some great ideas on how to influence this change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately we seem to be stuck in a Catch 22 position. </p>
<p>We need quieter bike regulations and the only way to achieve that goal is by influencing the AMA and the FIM that we need them.</p>
<p>These entities believe they are doing a great job at creating and enforcing the regulations they have.</p>
<p>A great deal of racers think that if the rules are set this way, they will comply with them to the limit. The aftermarket companies deliver what their customers are asking for.</p>
<p>The governing bodies are influenced greatly by the manufacturers, so much so that it has been jokingly stated that Honda runs the AMA. I don&#8217;t know if I would go that far, but it is worth considering why that joke exists.</p>
<p>The manufacturers claim that it would be difficult and extremely expensive to limit sound levels, so the rules are greatly influenced by this statement of hardship. The AMA and the FIM do not want to put undo pressure on the companies that support their livelihood, so they relax the standards. Or they allow them to be lower than they think would be best.</p>
<p>So now we have the manufacturers and the sanctioning bodies on one side and a few sane voices asking for quieter motocross machines on the other. The problem is that the voices asking for quiet are so few in number. In the middle you have the majority&#8230; they may not be giving the subject the attention it deserves because they are not thinking about the future as much as today.</p>
<p>I agree that the question is &#8220;how do we influence the powers that be.&#8221; I am open to suggestions. Anyone have some great ideas on how to influence this change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VintageBlueSmoke</title>
		<link>http://twostrokemotocross.com/2009/01/too-much-noise-are-4-strokes-killing-motocross/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>VintageBlueSmoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twostrokemotocross.com/?p=780#comment-156</guid>
		<description>I agree whole heartedly with you, General. The AMA and FIM should set the standard to lower noise emmissions for all racers, equally, and enforcably. I also agree witht he article that this is an excellent way to control horse power rather than forcing everyone to build 350&#039;s or what ever the flavor of the week is. I think that by forcing it upon the RACERS will have a trickle down effect on all consumers.

The point I&#039;d like to make is that this is not just a 4-stroke issue. Yes, they are louder and the sound caries farther, but this has been an ongoing battle - one we are losing more and more every day. The popularity of thumpers have just made it worse.

After several conversations with a particular AMA director, the AMA feels they deserve a pat on the back for setting the standards that they have. I feel they deserve a kick in the crotch for being half-assed and not tackling the situation up front.

To your question &quot;What the hell happened?&quot; is simple. The AMA was unable to gain concensus for quiet bikes and failed to enforse a set standard. Manufacturers created competitive thumpers at at a time that air quality was beginning to affect motorcycling. Thumpers being cleaner and using the loophole for double displacement, focused on expanding thumper consumption. Riders, always looking for advantage used louder exhausts.

So we know why. We also know how to fix it (set a rule for low noise emisions and enforce it). My question to you is &quot;How to we influence the powers that be (the FIM, AMA, and local organizations) to implement it?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree whole heartedly with you, General. The AMA and FIM should set the standard to lower noise emmissions for all racers, equally, and enforcably. I also agree witht he article that this is an excellent way to control horse power rather than forcing everyone to build 350&#8242;s or what ever the flavor of the week is. I think that by forcing it upon the RACERS will have a trickle down effect on all consumers.</p>
<p>The point I&#8217;d like to make is that this is not just a 4-stroke issue. Yes, they are louder and the sound caries farther, but this has been an ongoing battle &#8211; one we are losing more and more every day. The popularity of thumpers have just made it worse.</p>
<p>After several conversations with a particular AMA director, the AMA feels they deserve a pat on the back for setting the standards that they have. I feel they deserve a kick in the crotch for being half-assed and not tackling the situation up front.</p>
<p>To your question &#8220;What the hell happened?&#8221; is simple. The AMA was unable to gain concensus for quiet bikes and failed to enforse a set standard. Manufacturers created competitive thumpers at at a time that air quality was beginning to affect motorcycling. Thumpers being cleaner and using the loophole for double displacement, focused on expanding thumper consumption. Riders, always looking for advantage used louder exhausts.</p>
<p>So we know why. We also know how to fix it (set a rule for low noise emisions and enforce it). My question to you is &#8220;How to we influence the powers that be (the FIM, AMA, and local organizations) to implement it?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The General</title>
		<link>http://twostrokemotocross.com/2009/01/too-much-noise-are-4-strokes-killing-motocross/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>The General</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twostrokemotocross.com/?p=780#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Hey VintageBlueSmoke

While the switch to four-strokes did not create the problem they have exacerbated it.

Yes the noise issue of motorcycles has been around since the beginning, what is strange is the AMA&#039;s apparent about face on the subject. In the 1970&#039;s the AMA&#039;s slogan was &quot;Less sound equals more ground.&quot;

The question truly becomes, what the hell happened?

From my perspective in order for the four-strokes to make a return in the late 1990&#039;s, they needed a displacement advantage and a relaxation of the sound rules. I&#039;m sure that this was done in order to make the four-strokes competitive by producing as much power as was possible. But the past ten years has seen a huge jump in technological advances for the four-stroke.

The application of F1 technology to the four-strokes has made them ultra-competitive. Till now when you read the test comparisons, they are competitive with the two-strokes of equal displacement. In fact now it comes down to the rider preference.

Now that the four-strokes have reached this pinnacle, the sound issue needs to be addressed in a very serious way. These guys that design and build exhaust systems are geniuses. They can build systems that can be super powerful and at the same time be quiet.

Racers are racers... no one wants to give up power to make their bike quieter when they would be penalized. It must be an across the board change from the AMA and FIM so all will be equal. And the sound requirements should be the same for Pros, Amateurs and off-roaders, so the manufacturers and aftermarket only have to build to one standard.

Right now it seems as though the AMA is dancing around the issue, instead of facing it head on. Without some serious attention to sound rules in the near future, motocross will be in danger of extinction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey VintageBlueSmoke</p>
<p>While the switch to four-strokes did not create the problem they have exacerbated it.</p>
<p>Yes the noise issue of motorcycles has been around since the beginning, what is strange is the AMA&#8217;s apparent about face on the subject. In the 1970&#8242;s the AMA&#8217;s slogan was &#8220;Less sound equals more ground.&#8221;</p>
<p>The question truly becomes, what the hell happened?</p>
<p>From my perspective in order for the four-strokes to make a return in the late 1990&#8242;s, they needed a displacement advantage and a relaxation of the sound rules. I&#8217;m sure that this was done in order to make the four-strokes competitive by producing as much power as was possible. But the past ten years has seen a huge jump in technological advances for the four-stroke.</p>
<p>The application of F1 technology to the four-strokes has made them ultra-competitive. Till now when you read the test comparisons, they are competitive with the two-strokes of equal displacement. In fact now it comes down to the rider preference.</p>
<p>Now that the four-strokes have reached this pinnacle, the sound issue needs to be addressed in a very serious way. These guys that design and build exhaust systems are geniuses. They can build systems that can be super powerful and at the same time be quiet.</p>
<p>Racers are racers&#8230; no one wants to give up power to make their bike quieter when they would be penalized. It must be an across the board change from the AMA and FIM so all will be equal. And the sound requirements should be the same for Pros, Amateurs and off-roaders, so the manufacturers and aftermarket only have to build to one standard.</p>
<p>Right now it seems as though the AMA is dancing around the issue, instead of facing it head on. Without some serious attention to sound rules in the near future, motocross will be in danger of extinction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

